The point is not for it to be an "environmentalism" forum; it is about green tech... Maybe it is the use of the word "green" that some folks may consider offensive. Is there an alternative word that could be used to ensure that the subforum remains focused on efficiency/cost saving technology but not necessarily crossing the line that could bring in political discussion?
Maybe it could be the "Energy Efficiency and Alternative Energy-Related Home Technology" Forum? This would imply a limitation on the scope of discussion. "Home" is a key word, so - for example - you could discuss home-based solar or wind energy, but not discuss why Uncle Sam should fund building solar and wind farms. Discussion of how to take advantage of "cash for caulkers" is OK, but not the merits/weaknesses/failures, etc. of the policy.
The goal is overall consumption reduction that affects your wallet positively. Less electricity, natural gas and water consumption by me = more money in my wallet and to @#%$ with everyone else. At least that's how I see it.
Now, Dave X10 - the following is tongue in cheek:
- Spotted Owls with lasers on their heads to fend off loggers - this owl-laser interface can be considered as "environmental(ism) tech"
- A New American Bible on someone's eBook reader can be considered Catholic Tech, as can the Pope Mobile!
Some other possible names for the forum:
- Miser forum
- Tightwad forum
- Penny pincher forum
- Energy Saving forum
Honestly, though, I think 'Green Technologies" is appropriate, as long as, in the Forum's description, the official "CocoonTech Definition of Green" is established with the understanding that posts that violate the spirit of the discussion will be edited or deleted. I think some of the examples of what we consider appropriate green tech / energy saving discusssion have already been mentioned here. Maybe a sticky giving example of appropriate and innapropriate topics?