Elk keypad wiring question
#1
Posted 31 March 2012 - 05:31 PM
#2
Posted 31 March 2012 - 08:58 PM
I was wondering if I can have a wireless receiver tied into the databus terminals and then the databus board on J2 or if one precludes the other...
I've tried multiple permutations, and so far keep getting a Lost Comm error on my keypad - powers going to it just fine and I've re-terminated both ends of the connection (cat 5e cable and a rj45 male end at the other) according to their instructions for using 3 pair of the 4 pair wire, but no dice.
Anyone able to help us and clarify what can get connected to where?
Thanks,
SpaceLeeB
#3
Posted 31 March 2012 - 09:11 PM
Cat5/6 is fine, it is 24ga, unless you have an extraordinarily long run. You can follow the bus length calculations in the manual to determine if you have exceeded the run.
If you want to connect a device (i.e. the wireless rec) to the bus (and not to the DBH) I think it would be considered a second run. So in that case you would connect it to the databus connectors (NOT J1/J2) terminate it, install terminating plug in DBH and NOT terminate the M1 panel J3.
A bus has two ends, and no matter if there are one or two runs there is only one bus, so only two devices get terminated. If you have one run then the M1 JP3 will be terminated as it is one end of the bus. If you have two runs then the end devices on each run are terminated and the M1 is not because it is technically in the middle of the bus.
Edited by wuench, 31 March 2012 - 09:30 PM.
#4
Posted 01 April 2012 - 11:24 AM
You can also run a second set of devices in parrallel off of the RS 485 port along side the dbh set of devices. In this case, you no longer jumper jp3. This is how I have my setup. All of my dbh slots are used by devices, the last is jumpered and I have one more device in parrallel to the dbh off of the main board and it is terminated. JP3 is left open.
So in short, the dbh is treated as a single line of homerunned devices.
Keep in mind, that since the dbh runs the signal out and back with each device, you need to double the feet. The max is 4000ft so that leaves you 2000ft of actual cat5. And yes, cat5 is perfect for the job and is spec'd by Elk as such.
#5
Posted 01 April 2012 - 12:31 PM
#6
Posted 01 April 2012 - 01:40 PM
You can't really go wrong putting them all in series. If the ohms go too low (as when in parrallel) the current rises and at some point it will exceed the max allowable current and fry the system. The only downside to wiring all in series is that you can't individually control volume or turn individual ones on/off. There are devices that allow you to connect all of your speakers to a hub which maintaines minimum needed resistance and gives you individual volume control. But if you plan on having all of them always on a the same volume, there is no need.
#7
Posted 01 April 2012 - 03:19 PM
I looked at the speaker, they are 32ohms each so even if all 4 of them are in parallel I am at 8 ohms. If I go with the way I described it in the above post I should be at 32 ohms. Either way should be fine.When speakers are run in series, the ohms add up. When in parrallel, they are 1/a + 1/b = 1/total
You can't really go wrong putting them all in series. If the ohms go too low (as when in parrallel) the current rises and at some point it will exceed the max allowable current and fry the system. The only downside to wiring all in series is that you can't individually control volume or turn individual ones on/off. There are devices that allow you to connect all of your speakers to a hub which maintaines minimum needed resistance and gives you individual volume control. But if you plan on having all of them always on a the same volume, there is no need.
#8
Posted 01 April 2012 - 07:58 PM
If you're installing them in series, the load will be 32*4, so 128 ohms. Given that sort of loading on an amp, it's likely bad things could happen to the panel, if they work at all.
#9
Posted 01 April 2012 - 09:16 PM
If you're installing SPF12's (judging by the impedence listed) then installing 4 in parallel will deliver an 8 ohm load to the panel.
If you're installing them in series, the load will be 32*4, so 128 ohms. Given that sort of loading on an amp, it's likely bad things could happen to the panel, if they work at all.
Yes, as mentioned, 4 in parrallel is 8 ohms if each is 32 ohms. Elk specs say it is ok to go down to 4, so you are clear. 128 ohms would not harm the elk, but it might not produce good sound. To illustrate, take the example of a disconnected speaker jack, that is infinity ohms, which is more than 128 and that doesn't hurt anything. But I suspect the lack of current from 128 ohms would produce crappy or non-existent sound.
#10
Posted 02 April 2012 - 06:01 AM
I've (unfortunately) had this happen with a receiver at my house and my little ones as well as dealt with the after effects on very large audio installs and pro touring rigs. No load on an amp, with the output section cranked can, and typically will, damage the amp. Minor impedance mismatches, if done to the "high" side are safer than a low impedance mismatch.
#11
Posted 02 April 2012 - 07:35 AM
If you run an amp with infinity ohms/no load or too high a load, then provide a signal to it so it's pushing an output, it's very easy to let the magic smoke out, no different than running to low an impedance. It's why higher end amps always tell you to always have a proper load attached, nothing to do with sound quality.
I've (unfortunately) had this happen with a receiver at my house and my little ones as well as dealt with the after effects on very large audio installs and pro touring rigs. No load on an amp, with the output section cranked can, and typically will, damage the amp. Minor impedance mismatches, if done to the "high" side are safer than a low impedance mismatch.
This is just not true. A solid state amp will not be damaged by too high of impedence. At some point it will fail to deliver any power to the speakers but it won't cause any damage. A tube amp is different, but unless you have a 40 year old amp at home or you buy those eclectic $10,000 tube amps at the "I have more money than I know what to do with" stores, you won't fry your amp with too much impedence. In general, solid state amps are damaged by current, tube amps are damaged by voltage, and I am quite certain the Elk has no tubes.
Impedence matching has 2 functions, 1) to not damage the amp and 2) get the most efficient use of power out of the amp. With solid state amps, not going too high adresses by point 2, and not going too low addresses point 1.
Edited by Lou Apo, 02 April 2012 - 07:41 AM.
#12
Posted 02 April 2012 - 07:44 AM
#13
Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:01 AM
This is just not true. A solid state amp will not be damaged by too high of impedence. At some point it will fail to deliver any power to the speakers but it won't cause any damage. A tube amp is different, but unless you have a 40 year old amp at home or you buy those eclectic $10,000 tube amps at the "I have more money than I know what to do with" stores, you won't fry your amp with too much impedence. In general, solid state amps are damaged by current, tube amps are damaged by voltage, and I am quite certain the Elk has no tubes.
Impedence matching has 2 functions, 1) to not damage the amp and 2) get the most efficient use of power out of the amp. With solid state amps, not going too high adresses by point 2, and not going too low addresses point 1.
Lou, the statement is incorrect. What you or someone else chooses to do with their equipment is one thing, but failure to understand impedance and what the effect of too high or too low a load does to the equipment is where the magic smoke gets let out of hardware.
Barring an amplifier's protection circuit, which is another discussion and design criteria for a product, too high a load will cause voltages inside the amp to be too high, which can damage power output tubes or transistors. I have a site I am working on where the electricians did exactly what you said wouldn't damage equipment....they tied too many speakers in a non-coupled mass notification system together in series. They blew up half a rack of amps.
#14
Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:03 AM
Tubes yes, but the Elk is not "tubed", and for all intents and purposes, nothing has a tube anymore. Solid state amps are not damaged by high impedence. As indicated, that is exactly why the amps actually purposely disconnect the speakers if they detect a short. . . to protect themselves. Solid state amps need to be protected from run away current, not lack of current. By your logic, an amp that is turned on with no speakers connected and left that way would smoke. But they do not. Furthermore, read the hifi stereo literature and there will be no mention of taking care not to over impede the system, only under. And these same articles will say, "but if you have a tube amp the opposite is true". In fact, just turning a tube amp on without speakers connected can damage them, but this is not the case for solid state.
Perhaps if you have high impedence, you don't get good volume, so you turn the volume all the way up to the top and leave it that way for a long time, that might fry your amp. But that is not really an impedence issue, that is simply that you are using too small of an amplifier for the task at hand. The same thing would happen at lower impedence if you turned it all the way and left it that way.
#15
Posted 06 April 2012 - 09:43 AM
Something isn't adding up... Maybe I'll disconnect my speakers and crank my amp and leave it all day (I already ordered a replacement) - I doubt any harm will come.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













