Just want to make sure I'm doing this right...
I have three remote cans, each containing a DBH and one or more expansion boards. Currently, all the remote expansion boards are getting their power from the M1G via the DBH's (using cat5e cables for the connections). Two of the cans are within a few feet of where I'm putting an Altronix 12VDC 10A PS. The other can is next to where I'm relocating a Elk P412 PS.
First... to create a common negative, I can run a wire from 12VDC(-) terminal on each PS to the 12VDC(-) terminal on the remote can's DBH. So the Altronix PS will have a wire running from its negative to each of the two DBH negatives in the nearby cans, and the P412 PS will have a wire running from its negative to the DBH negative in its nearby can.
Second... On each expansion board, I can clip the two 12VDC power wires coming from the DBH and run power supply wires from the expansion board to the PS.
Third... Even though I have room on a zone expander near the Altronix (that the Altronix will be powering), is it best to run the Altronix supervision contacts to zones in my "main can" (that contains the M1G). My concern is that if the Altronix fails hard, the zone expander powered by it will lose its connection, so the M1G detection will be less specific (lost expanders(s) communication instead of both Altronix failure and lost expander(s) communication). The Altronix will be powering an Uplink 2500 and some other pretty important stuff, so failure notification is important. The P412 will be powering stuff that isn't as important, and I have other ways to detect failures. Alternatively, would it be better to continue to power one remote zone expander via the M1G/DBH and connect the Altronix supervision relays to zones on that expander?
Does the above sound correct, or is there a better way?
Thanks,
Ira
I have three remote cans, each containing a DBH and one or more expansion boards. Currently, all the remote expansion boards are getting their power from the M1G via the DBH's (using cat5e cables for the connections). Two of the cans are within a few feet of where I'm putting an Altronix 12VDC 10A PS. The other can is next to where I'm relocating a Elk P412 PS.
First... to create a common negative, I can run a wire from 12VDC(-) terminal on each PS to the 12VDC(-) terminal on the remote can's DBH. So the Altronix PS will have a wire running from its negative to each of the two DBH negatives in the nearby cans, and the P412 PS will have a wire running from its negative to the DBH negative in its nearby can.
Second... On each expansion board, I can clip the two 12VDC power wires coming from the DBH and run power supply wires from the expansion board to the PS.
Third... Even though I have room on a zone expander near the Altronix (that the Altronix will be powering), is it best to run the Altronix supervision contacts to zones in my "main can" (that contains the M1G). My concern is that if the Altronix fails hard, the zone expander powered by it will lose its connection, so the M1G detection will be less specific (lost expanders(s) communication instead of both Altronix failure and lost expander(s) communication). The Altronix will be powering an Uplink 2500 and some other pretty important stuff, so failure notification is important. The P412 will be powering stuff that isn't as important, and I have other ways to detect failures. Alternatively, would it be better to continue to power one remote zone expander via the M1G/DBH and connect the Altronix supervision relays to zones on that expander?
Does the above sound correct, or is there a better way?
Thanks,
Ira