OK, I just finished perusing the white paper. I found it HIGHLY biased.
While it does have a lot of information, that information is suspect. I found many inaccuracies in the ZigBee section (all in Insteon's favor), and it seems all other protocols were similarly shortchanged.
An appendix was devoted to evaluating UPB's susceptibility to noise, but no similar evaluation was done for Insteon.
And there is no comparison of the security of the different protocols. The paper constantly derides ZWave's Master-Remote, which is an important ingredient to it's security, but not once does it acknowledge this. I'm sure it's because Insteon has no security.
Five pages (APPENDIX II — Z-Wave Usability Evaluation) is devoted simply to slamming ZWave. Here is an excerpt:
The Intermatic display is always on, but the HomePro display turns off entirely after you have not pushed a button for several seconds. Pushing any button turns the HomePro display back on, but then you wonder, did the button you pushed only turn on the display or did it also perform the button’s function?
Where does this fit as a comparison to Insteon? All five pages of that appendix is spent nit-picking any minor flaw in every ZWave product.
I filed it into the recycle bin. . .