The guy I spoke to liked the MRJ for my network. It offers a little more protection because it shunts to ground at a lower threshold than the 110c6a but at the same time it will probably have a shorter lifespan for the same reason. The more current that the device shunts the more wear and tear on it. It is a judgement call. At the same time he said that he would be comfortable with either in this situation.
You want to choose a device that will clamp very close to the service voltage but not so close that you risk interfering with the data going through the device. The MRJ is very close but they know from testing that it is good with IP.
I like the MRJ because it uses rj45 termination rather than punch-down . I can easily test the device with a cat6 cable tester and two patch cables and it will be easy to test and replace in the future.
Mike.
You want to choose a device that will clamp very close to the service voltage but not so close that you risk interfering with the data going through the device. The MRJ is very close but they know from testing that it is good with IP.
I like the MRJ because it uses rj45 termination rather than punch-down . I can easily test the device with a cat6 cable tester and two patch cables and it will be easy to test and replace in the future.
Mike.