Feds find Fiat Chrysler gear shifters can confuse drivers

pete_c

Guru
Published February 08, 2016 Associated Press
 
jeep-shifter-876.jpg


Electronic gear shifters on some newer Fiat Chrysler SUVs and cars are so confusing that drivers have exited the vehicles with the engines running and while they are still in gear, causing crashes and serious injuries, U.S. safety investigators have determined.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in documents posted during the weekend, has doubled the number of vehicles involved in an investigation of the problem, but it stopped short of seeking a recall. The agency found more than 100 crashes and over a dozen injuries, mostly in Jeep Grand Cherokees.

Agency tests found that operating the center console shift lever "is not intuitive and provides poor tactile and visual feedback to the driver, increasing the potential for unintended gear selection," investigators wrote in the documents. They upgraded the probe to an engineering analysis, which is a step closer to a recall. NHTSA will continue to gather information and seek a recall if necessary, a spokesman said.

The investigation could determine just how much automakers can change the way cars operate when they introduce new technology, and how far they can stray from conventional ways of controlling vehicles that drivers are accustomed to.

Jake Fisher, director of auto testing for Consumer Reports, expects more problems and investigations as automakers continue to roll out new electronic controls that are unfamiliar to drivers. "I think the manufacturers need to be much more responsible as they try these new technologies," he said.

The government's probe now covers more than 856,000 vehicles including the popular Jeep Grand Cherokee SUV from the 2014 and 2015 model years and the 2012 through 2014 Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300 sedans with 3.6-liter V6 engines.

In the vehicles, drivers pull the shift lever forward or backward to select gears and the shifter doesn't move along a track like in most cars. A light shows which gear is selected, but to get from Drive to Park, drivers must push the lever forward three times. The gearshift does not have notches that match up with the gear you want to shift into, and it moves back to a centered position after the driver picks a gear.

The vehicles sound a chime and issue a dashboard warning if the driver's door is opened while they are not in Park. But investigators found that the push-button start-stop feature doesn't shut off the engine if the vehicles aren't in Park, increasing the risk of the vehicles rolling away after drivers have exited.

"This function does not protect drivers who intentionally leave the engine running or drivers who do not recognize that the engine continues to run after an attempted shut-off," investigators wrote.

Thus far, the investigation has found 314 complaints, 121 crashes and 30 injuries from the problem. Three drivers reported fractured pelvic bones, while four others needed to be hospitalized with a ruptured bladder, fractured kneecap, or severe leg trauma.

Fiat Chrysler says it is cooperating in the probe. The company changed the shifters in the 2016 Grand Cherokee and 2015 Charger and 300 sedans so they function more like people are used to. But FCA said it did so to increase customer satisfaction and not for safety concerns.

One driver, in Atkinson, New Hampshire, complained that in November of last year, her 2014 Grand Cherokee began traveling in reverse with no driver inside. The SUV crossed a street, crashed into a mailbox and rolled up a driveway. The driver wrote that she tried to get back into the Jeep but was knocked to the ground and it rolled over her legs and injured her. The Jeep eventually stopped after hitting a fence. Drivers are not identified in the NHTSA complaint database.

"The shift knob is a real problem," wrote another driver from Enumclaw, Washington, who reported two unintentional roll-away incidents in a 2015 Grand Cherokee. "I am not a complainer, however this is a major safety issue. It terrifies me to drive this vehicle."

Fiat Chrysler is not alone with the tricky shifters. Fisher says BMW and Mercedes-Benz have similar gearshifts. He said the government has a thin line to walk between stifling innovation and keeping people safe.

"I think the best thing for consumers isn't that legislation comes," he said. "The best thing is that automakers really do not start adding features that are really confusing to people and cause accidents."
 
Personally here have two automobiles of the same manufacturer a few years apart.  Both have a sort of automatic (speedshifting?) manual means of changing gears in the transmission.  Downshifting (goes down) on one automobile is opposite on the other automobile (goes up) while the gear shifters are almost physically identical.  Personally I like the power feature button on the shifter that takes the automobile from 300HP to 500HP with the push of a button. (button automotive automation).
 
I always buy the cars with intuitive gear shifters, just for that reason.
 
 
With the slower gears forward at the back and the gear lever progressing toward the extreme front for reverse it makes me, as an MS Windows user, feel right at home, where I click on the "Start" button, to shut the computer down. 
 
;->
 
 
Intuitive? Nonsense! It just not an American habit like a Jewish Nun  would wear.
 
Interesting topic...  I travel enough that I drive a lot of rental cars - and probably +95% of the time, they're pretty intuitive - I just get in and drive... if it starts raining I instinctively reach for where I'd expect the wipers to be, and rarely do I have to stop to study a car before just going.  Windows, Mirrors, Locks - they're all right where you expect.
 
A few weeks ago, I got a Chrysler - 200 I think... and it had very different controls (granted I know GM, Ford, Nissan quite well; I never drive Chrysler).  Push button parking brake, push to start (which I am used to), and a couple other differences like in how it shifted I think... just enough to make me spend a few seconds looking around.
 
Driving is such an instinctual thing - it must be a challenge for the automakers as they digitize everything still trying to make people feel like they have more analog control.  I remember reading that a lot of the tactile feedback you feel in a GM steering wheel was artificial as they got closer to drive-by-wire.  That was 13 years ago...  now it should be more about tactile feedback than an actual connected feeling like it used to be.
 
Personally here have not noticed non intuitive shifters in any car driven over the last 30 years or so. 
 
Its been now some 20 years that I have seen similar methodologies of electronic shifting in my personal auto mobiles.
 
Many years ago when travelling and needing to rent vehicles I would try different auto mobiles (bulk made rental fleet cars) and didn't really notice much relating to having to learn the controls of a vehicle.  That said always liked the modern and appealing styling of the Chrysler vehicles relating to rentals and owned.  My personal issue was that I would notice would be loose screws and mouldings on the rentals and more problems with the convertibles at the time. I did notice premature failures on engines and transmissions on purchased Chryslers from the 90's.  That is a long time ago.  Consumer reports of lately did give poor ratings to the newest Fiats. 
 
Most of the time the built in safety features are built in and typically it is intuitive for most drivers.
 
I do too see now the advent of putting a disclaimer on a shifter, steering wheel, starter, et al just in case it is confusing to a driver.
not
Thinking some time (grand children) with automation there will not really be a need to learn to drive other than some basics on using the electronics of an auto mobile (push buttons) for automated driverless vehicles.
 
To be sure some folks adapt to changes quicker than others. I can see how this might throw some folks. 
 
If I understand this design correctly instead of being able to move directly, say, from Drive to Park, you have to bump the shift handle a fixed number of times, as it steps from one setting to another.
 
My car has a "manual shift" feature (which I rarely use) which works like that - once you are already in Drive.
 
To use a compute term it appears to be "sequential access" as opposed to "random access".
 
Not sure I would like this approach.
 
Here two vehicles have manual shifting that is still controlled by the mothership of the automobile.  
 
That said there is also "paddle" shifting which sits on the steer wheel which at one time was popular option then it wasn't along with the power boost button options. 
 
I have an old friends who lives in the rural parts of TN.  Her husband added nitrous injection to her Ford truck for that little bit speed on some rural country driving roads.  She seldom did utilize it but it was an option she liked.
 
I do not personally think (but not knowing for sure now after reading the article) but for years now thinking you do have to put your foot on the brake to shift the auto mobile from park to drive on automatic transmissions.  Eliminating this safety feature or not knowing if the auto mobile was in drive mode would be a faux pas and an absolute brainless automotive design engineer.
 
pete_c said:
Here two vehicles have manual shifting that is still controlled by the mothership of the automobile.  
 
That said there is also "paddle" shifting which sits on the steer wheel which at one time was popular option then it wasn't along with the power boost button options. 
 
I have an old friends who lives in the rural parts of TN.  Her husband added nitrous injection to her Ford truck for that little bit speed on some rural country driving roads.  She seldom did utilize it but it was an option she liked.
 
I do not personally think (but not knowing for sure now after reading the article) but for years now thinking you do have to put your foot on the brake to shift the auto mobile from park to drive on automatic transmissions.  Eliminating this safety feature or not knowing if the auto mobile was in drive mode would be a faux pas and an absolute brainless automotive design engineer.
Yes, the vehicles still have a brake interlock - you must put your foot on the brake to get the vehicle out of park.  The issue is when people want to put the vehicle back into park and are failing to do that properly.  Additionally, if you don't put the vehicle in park, then pressing the start/stop button does not turn off the engine.  Then add in the fact that the gasoline engines are very quiet, so if the person doesn't properly put it in park and stop the engine, they don't realize it is still running and in gear when they try to step out of the vehicle.
 
Personally, I think it comes down to Darwinism.  It does not matter how it is designed, some idiots will still find a way to fail the system and hurt themselves.
 
Here's a video of exactly how the shifter works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1wPL03sCqA
 
Personally, I think it comes down to Darwinism.  It does not matter how it is designed, some idiots will still find a way to fail the system and hurt themselves.
 
True.
 
I remember now in the 1980's the brake pedal / accelerator pedal being too close (?) in the Audi which caused some issues.
 
I didn't purchase the 5000 (which was given away for some time) at the time but did purchase some two Audi's from the 80's to the 90's (quattro's?) at some great prices new at the time.  I did have issues anyways if I drove the vehicles with oversized snow boots.
 
Reported incidents of sudden acceleration, include:
  • 1987: The 1982-1987 Audi 5000s sales in the United States fell after recalls linked to sudden unintended acceleration. There were 700 accidents and 6 deaths.
 
Back
Top