dhull3 said:
Well from the prospective of a firefighter a "smoke alarm" is better than a "smoke detector" for both life safety and property conservation. One gets help on the immediately and the other does not. But I'm not going down that road. I know all too well nfpa standards are minimum and do not keep up with modern conditions or technology.
Just as an update spoke with HAI rep. There is not currently a way to tie in hardwire smokes. I will need to get a receiver and wireless or z wave smokes to replace the builder installed ones. Thanks for all the information I'm new to the site and everything has been so helpful
Sorry to say, fire fighter or not, your terminology and understanding is flawed or confused. I'm presently NICET 3 certified and presently working on my NICET 4 and 20 years of system design and installation.
Further reading and reference:
http://www.fireengineering.com/articles/2008/10/smoke-alarm-or-smoke-detector.html
Smoke alarms are generally one of the lowest form of devices. They are local and NOT connected to a system or FACP or intended to be monitored. Smoke detectors are designed to be interconnected and report back to a system. UL listings make very clear what the differences beyond that are.
The NEC and NFPA are not system installation or design standards, they never were intended as such and never will be a prescriptive document. They only provide the permissible minimums allowable to be installed. Most building codes take the minimums and add to them.
In your specific case, the suggestion was made to remove the existing smoke alarms and replace them with suitable smoke detectors. You're going to have at least a 14/3 between them, and hopefully if your locale didn't adopt the practice of running a branch circuit device to the smoke alarm circuit (which some have, though not a code mandate). The worst case, would be you have a 14/2 from the panel to the smoke alarm circuit and hopefully no branch devices connected. Pull the feed from the breaker box, move to a 4" square, and pull a new 18/4 from the FACP to the box, then the remaining NPLF cabling would be suitable for a compliant 2 wire fire loop, assuming you put components with sounders and configure a tandem ring.
That would be a far better and more robust solution than a Zwave (not the right product for life safety) or wireless (no tandem ring or compliance for the spirit of the code). The only item within question is whether or not your AHJ will permit you to remove the existing smoke alarms and replace them with a compliant installation of smoke detectors (which can easily exceed the operating characteristics of smoke alarms). The point would be, a properly installed smoke detector system connected to a FACP is a far better installation compared to a smoke alarm system. That said, it becomes a discussion point between yourself and the AHJ to sign off on the modifications to the property as they signed the CO.
The cost to go to the wireless devices you stated simply does not make economic sense compared to what could really be done via the existing infrastructure for a more robust and reliable system. You only have 2 items to check for, that would be if there's a branch circuit connected or if you can get an 18/4 from your panel to your electrical panel. The rest is easy and elementary installation assuming the locations as chosen by the electrician are appropriate to reuse.