Garage and monitored are a bad idea. You could, however, set one up as standaone and wire the contacts in parallel with the OHD opener and use a OHD contact as an interlock, so detection would force the OHD open. Local alarm only and independent of the system. Never use a rule to annunciate a safety condition, KISS.
Immediately adjacent to the door is a poor location due to strong drafts and air movement. Typically you'd want one central to the location where people congregate or sleep. System connected alarms, the fire alarm is supposed to always take a higher precedence than CO. Tandem ring may be desired, and achieved, but must be temp 4.
Typical pro monitored response would be to dispatch the FD. They would be the only people with the equipment to meter the situation. How your CS acts and responds would need confirmation, however I would say due to liability issues, they should call the FD.
The standards can be viewed for free, NFPA 720 and most manufacturers have white papers and installation documents.
System Sensor:
http://www.systemsensor.com/en-us/documents/system-connected_co_detector_app_guide_coag103.pdf
I've used System Sensor for years. Prior to that, it was ESL/GE 240's (and subsequent massive recalls) and the prior version before being bought by GE, Concord. I've also used Macurco (the old flush mount 2 gang units) but after consideration, you have to think about the drafts that many wall cavities have. Also serviced systems that used PAMA units.