(JeffCharger @ Apr 12 2005, 03:30 AM)
That just shows you that the whole antenna thing is only half science and half luck.
Not true Jeff, read my HOW-TO and you will see the calculations involved.
BSR, I guess I was too flippant with my statement. What I have found though is that even when you apply the appropriate physics, there are a number of 'other' factors that affect the antenna performance. So I would say that the 'science' is necessary, but not sufficient!
I have built at least 4 antennas and tried a number of already built antennas - and my findings for my particular installation have proven that even though on paper one antenna should perform better - it doesn't necessarily. I believe that it's the 'other' factors that affect it. That's the 'non-science' aspect I was referencing.
Here's what I found to work in my situation......discovered through hours of testing, crawling, and climbing.....
My W800 performs best without an antenna attached, and just a 25 foot coax attached.
I have the ground plane antenna (originally built to attach to the W800) is now used as a transmit antenna attached to my CM19A for ninja control.
I liked hearing that some were successful in using a standard TV tower. I, like many, have taken their TV antenna out of service. I still have a 40 foot tower with a Lindsay 2100 antenna on top with a rotor......tried that combo too, didn't work for me....rats!
(I now hacked the rotor on the antenna to mount to a camera!)
So, I agree the science is critical, but the proof's in the testing....
(P.S. I love the ground plane antenna!)