macromark
Active Member
UPB is a very robust protocol but the powerline tether and and lack of a wireless component to the protocol is probably what kept UPB from achieving wider industry adoption. Sensors, door locks and other battery powered devices are essential for most home systems and UPB users have to turn to other protocols for that piece of the pie.rismoney said:UPB is at the core of my house and most new fangled controllers can't deal with upstart files. UPB hasn't marketed itself well or made modern inroads like multiplatform upstart or push integration side. It could ultimately go revolv.
On OS front, Openhab is interesting but Java is a turnoff and upb support lackluster (in a seemingly defunct PR). There are probably a bunch of other open source products with similar approaches.
As Pete pointed out (above), we currently offer 2 different drivers for UPB. One plug-in is our own (ported from the HS2 version) and one is written by a 3rd party author ("Spud"). The protocol hasn't changed much over the years so both of these are pretty solid. I would recommend giving them a try.
Somebody at Nest probably should have checked the Google code of conduct before deciding to shut down the hubs.BobS0327 said: