I'll just state factual "in the wild" observations.....
We have very large sites that run 485 and 422 over very large distances for many purposes, sometimes STP is needed, sometimes UTP is needed, sometimes whatever is tossed in the pipe works. The big item is how tolerant the device(s) are to what conductors are installed. Some are pretty robust, others go down if you tap your foot.
Most of the alarm industry items, a sweeping generic term, but I'll toss out PTZ's, data for comms on access control panels and the comparatively simple M1, are pretty tolerant of various cabling types and methods. In a different comms application, sure, you may need the twisted pair, but in Elk's case, I believe it's more to facilitate easier 485 installation for the novice, as most panels don't or haven't used this technology (anyone remember the old Optex panels that did?). It's far easier for a novice or hobbyist to plug a RJ in than make the greater effort for in-out daisy....hell many guys, not just DIY can't comprehend how to properly wire a fire alarm.
In Elk's specific case (I've had many calls in to the engineers when the panel was first coming out) they were adamant that no special cabling was needed other than to maintain the topology, and I've experienced just that with many M1 installs. Their data conforms with EIA-485, however there's other items in the equation (I've had some interesting conversations about connecting an M1 via fiber for outbuildings).
In the case of the OP, for devices located out from the panel, not connected to existing KP runs, you're going to need 6 conductors pulled if you're not going to do anything with the present KP wiring. You can hop off the existing pulls, however voltage loss for the devices in the daisy is going to be an issue.