Steve
Senior Member
Ok, I think we are in agreement you just need to read my posts a little more carefully.
I said "And some of the things mentioned like "Motion can turn up lighting if they are dimmed then go back down after a certain amount of time." is not possible without a PIR and controller, the timer module alone can't react to motion."
You replied "Steve, you may be talking about the feature set with the Simply Automated Timer. I am using the timer from Web Mtn and it definitely can do what I have mentioned, if you use wireless devices that communicate back to a receiver with contact closures. The I/O ties in there and events can happen."
I am talking about the TIM-01-A. So my point was using the timer by itself. You are talking about using the DXT-54 PIR with either the CM-01 I/O module or DXR-702 receiver. We are saying the same thing. You are simply pointing out a less expensive solution to do some very simple stuff which is fine. But even with the CM01 or DX wireless you are still very limited compared to something like an Elk. For somebody that doesn't need or want more sophisticated automation and simply needs some motion or simple limited I/O, yes, your solution works fine, but still doesn't support enough functionality that the OP (and many other) would want.
I said "Sure, unless the switches downright fail, its usually not a crisis if a light does not respond to automation but you sure get used to it and will cuss alot when it doesn't work 99.9% of the time." I did not say UPB has a 99.9% failure rate, any product with a failure rate like that would not last a month in the market. The point was if your system/lighting does not work 99.9% of the time, you will be frustrated, therefore IMHO you may be better served by a hardware panel solution (or pure UPB products as you have mentioned).
So, lets return this to the original point, we have gone back and forth enough essentially agreeing
I said "And some of the things mentioned like "Motion can turn up lighting if they are dimmed then go back down after a certain amount of time." is not possible without a PIR and controller, the timer module alone can't react to motion."
You replied "Steve, you may be talking about the feature set with the Simply Automated Timer. I am using the timer from Web Mtn and it definitely can do what I have mentioned, if you use wireless devices that communicate back to a receiver with contact closures. The I/O ties in there and events can happen."
I am talking about the TIM-01-A. So my point was using the timer by itself. You are talking about using the DXT-54 PIR with either the CM-01 I/O module or DXR-702 receiver. We are saying the same thing. You are simply pointing out a less expensive solution to do some very simple stuff which is fine. But even with the CM01 or DX wireless you are still very limited compared to something like an Elk. For somebody that doesn't need or want more sophisticated automation and simply needs some motion or simple limited I/O, yes, your solution works fine, but still doesn't support enough functionality that the OP (and many other) would want.
Again, I never said that, read my post more carefully <_<I am not sure where the 99.9% failure comes from, UPB is much more reliable than that
I said "Sure, unless the switches downright fail, its usually not a crisis if a light does not respond to automation but you sure get used to it and will cuss alot when it doesn't work 99.9% of the time." I did not say UPB has a 99.9% failure rate, any product with a failure rate like that would not last a month in the market. The point was if your system/lighting does not work 99.9% of the time, you will be frustrated, therefore IMHO you may be better served by a hardware panel solution (or pure UPB products as you have mentioned).
So, lets return this to the original point, we have gone back and forth enough essentially agreeing
