wkearney99
Senior Member
Yes, /16 255.255.0.0 instead of /24 255.255.255.0 (and not a single host /32)
I know most networking isn't supposed to care about the subnet (other than it being necessary). Any particular reason to use /22 instead of /16? Although I suppose 1022 hosts is probably "more than enough".
How was multicast during the transition? Stuff like SSDP, UPnP and other dynamic naming schemes that use it, any rough spots?
I've avoided IPv6 like the plague. Oh, I let devices run it internally (with their defaults), but only ad-hoc and not actually DHCP leased. I have enough headaches, if you know what I mean.
I know most networking isn't supposed to care about the subnet (other than it being necessary). Any particular reason to use /22 instead of /16? Although I suppose 1022 hosts is probably "more than enough".
How was multicast during the transition? Stuff like SSDP, UPnP and other dynamic naming schemes that use it, any rough spots?
I've avoided IPv6 like the plague. Oh, I let devices run it internally (with their defaults), but only ad-hoc and not actually DHCP leased. I have enough headaches, if you know what I mean.