As a typical American business person I use whatever OS help me growth my business. Like all humans, I have my preferences, but I do my best effort to not let them to interfere in my business strategy. After all, my partner would not let me neither.
This means, in 95% of the cases Windows is the client and Linux is the server. However, for the last 2 years I have been using an OSX laptop about 25% of my time to make sure that I stay up-to-date in the latest technology.
That said, I appreciate Google's effort of creating technology with not much vendor lock-in (I can take the standards-based or otherwise documented format data and go elsewhere whenever I want). In the same sense, I have learned to be wary of falling in Microsoft's and Apple's attempts of locking me into their technology. Having the option of more than one source for your business solutions is not just good
Strategic Sourcing practice. It is also common sense. Notice that this is also one of the major reasons for using Linux. I cannot think how protecting my business in this way can be anti-american.
I could not also understand how a Fortune 500 company like RedHat is anti-american. Or how could Novell's Suse, or Oracle's Ubreakable Linux, or IBM's Linux-based mainframes be it neither. Or how could any of the non-Windows web-based companies like Facebook or eBay (that have allowed so many people to reach the american dream of having their own business) be. Or how the National Laboratories using Linux supercomputers to support strategic nuclear, weather or economic research for our country could be tagged that way. This is a new economy. And we have to stop bashing the telephone for taking the jobs of the telegraphers. Look how IBM is not complaining anymore about the death of the typewriter! Actually, Microsoft has recently grown up to the new reality too. You just need to visit their new
WebsiteSpark site (that my company is using too), and click on the
GetWebApp link. If you are not Rip Van Winkle you will recognize many of the applications listed there. And a quick
Google Bing search will let you know that all of them are open-source applications. Would that make Microsoft anti-american?
As they say, you cannot teach new tricks to an old dog (and I sincerely think that this is the core of the problem), but
here is an article about serious uses of Linux. I wrote it with the hope of fostering the next Steve Wozniak among the readers (sorry guys, I keep the next Bill Gates title for myself

- even that I'm too late already!). Notice that the article is targeted to young people, as a big share of the readers of that blog are high school and early college students interested in developing a career in technology. It is obvious that I never expected
old dogs to be receptive to my advise - so you might certainly disagree with it.
My ideal OS would be a transparent OS, non-relevant in other ways that speed, stability and security. So, I would choose the OS based on speed, stability and security only. It would be almost a commodity. It would follow open standards in a way that would left me move all my data to any other OS without impact. It would also be able to run any application written in an open language. So I would not be forced to use a different OS just because that is it was the developer happened to have (some CEO that I know fears this freedom more than any other thing in the world, and this fear to fair competition is in my book very anti-american). It would be supported by a business partner that would lock-me-in by the quality of their service - not by using technology tricks and closed source. I would have freedom to move over to the next best competitor (like in free America), but I will not want to do it, because I would be happy with them. And BTW, even with all that freedom, just like RedHat Enterprise Linux and Windows Server, it would not be free.
In what level of the
Americanism scale would this ideal OS fall? I hope not to offend anybody by asking too much of a good thing. Will it even happen? I think that not in my lifespan. In the meantime, many jobs will be saved by free and open source software just as Apple was saved (in part, obviously) by the
reapplication of the free Unix-based BSD. I certainly enjoy my FOSS derived iPhone.