Lou, in this case this post and your subsequent post is extremely incorrect and misleading. I am not flaming you, but merely trying to provide accurate information.
The case of a sounder, or multiple sounders going off is generally a non-issue with most panels,and I have not seen an issue where a panel is unable to support the proper # of smoke detectors listed in alarm state, the inherent problem is accomplishing a tandem ring with all sounders synchronized, and the problem with a reversing relay, no matter 2 or 4 wire, is you need to have it connected to a supply capable of powering all the sounders involved going off. The statement "limited by panel" with current values is misleading and easily misunderstood by those that are not in the trade/industry. I'm not going to get into the whole definitions or explain how these things are rated/engineered, as that value is irrelevant to this discussion.
A power supervision relay IS required by code for a 4 wire fire loop and the majority of manufacturer's smokes that have an aux relay listed, it is not for these purposes, so 9/10 times a separate power supervision relay is needed and installed. Your statement regarding the 4WTAR is absolutely false regarding a power supervision relay, as the aux relay is intended for a separate purpose (such as elevator recall or release). The one you listed does have a supervisiory relay, however that is a rare thing to find in any manufacturer's unit.
In the case of the Elk (and other panels) it makes no difference as to how much power the zone on a 2 wire fire circuit can put out, as the maximium # of detectors, as well as compatible detectors, is listed by the manufacturer or the panel as well as the smoke detector's manufacturer. Intending on exceeding or not heeding the manufacturer's number of supported units is foolhearted, and in the case of a reversing relay on a 2 wire fire loop, the power for the tandem ring is always drawn from another power source and not the zone in question, so current draw upon alarm is not relevant to this discussion.