felixrosbergen
Senior Member
Hi Spanky,
I'm planning a reasonable size ALC installation (12 lights in now, another 10 to 15 to go) and am using the OnQ ELK<>ALC interface.
Everything is working quite well, but i'm running into the following issues:
SPEED OF COMMAND EXECUTION
- There is about a 1 sec delay between subsequent liights going on/off when they are part of the same rule. I setup some tets rules with 6 lights and conditions to turn them all on or all off. I can see the progression through the house. About 1 light per second.
- If i put an X in the 'Opt' column to 'Elimate the delay between subsequent lighting commands' not all the lights go on/off. It seems the commands are issued too fast and only some are executed.
- The 1 second delay may sound trivial, but when trying to make smooth lighting scene transitions it doesn't look very good.
- According to the lighting screen the delay should not be needed for lighting commands via M1XSP, which is essentially what i'm doing since the OnQ ELK<>ALC interface is supposed to include those components.
Is the delay changeble so i can set it to something shorter? Also I have not gotten there yet, but i am planning to have some lighting control rule within CQC with CQC telling ELK which lights to turn on/off. Would this still be subject to the same delays?
SETTING LEVEL TO 0
- The ELK lighting rules allow me to turn the light on to xx% value, which for ALC the dimmer create a fairly smooth transition doing so.
- When transition speed is slower/nices when using 'Set to 100%' then 'Turn On'
- Using "Turn Off' is not smooth at all and the problem is that the screens do not allow 'Set to 0%', the lowest value is 1%. This means there no way to turns the lights of smoothly unless i used double the rules space to first set it to 1% and then issue the turn off command. While this could work it's obviously not the most sensible way.
- The interesting thing is that when controller the lights using CQC with CQC giving the commands to ELK to turn the ALC lights on/off the CQC system allow me to 'set to 0'.
It is possible to change something to allow the rules to control the lights by 'Set to 0%' rather then 'turn off'? This would be great. Since It's already possible when CQC issues the command to ELK it seems strange that the ELK cannot do it by itself.
My overall plan is to have basic lighting control rules within the ELK which are all prefixed with a condition checking if CQC is online. If CQC is online then it would control all the lighting by issuing commands to the ELK and none of the ELK lighting rules woudl execute. If CQC is offline then the ELK lighting rules would be functional. I plan to have ELK check if CQC is online by having CQC flip an output every 60 seconds and then have ELK reset a counter everytime this happens. If the counter reaches 0 that means CQC didn't flip the ouput and it's offline.
I'm planning a reasonable size ALC installation (12 lights in now, another 10 to 15 to go) and am using the OnQ ELK<>ALC interface.
Everything is working quite well, but i'm running into the following issues:
SPEED OF COMMAND EXECUTION
- There is about a 1 sec delay between subsequent liights going on/off when they are part of the same rule. I setup some tets rules with 6 lights and conditions to turn them all on or all off. I can see the progression through the house. About 1 light per second.
- If i put an X in the 'Opt' column to 'Elimate the delay between subsequent lighting commands' not all the lights go on/off. It seems the commands are issued too fast and only some are executed.
- The 1 second delay may sound trivial, but when trying to make smooth lighting scene transitions it doesn't look very good.
- According to the lighting screen the delay should not be needed for lighting commands via M1XSP, which is essentially what i'm doing since the OnQ ELK<>ALC interface is supposed to include those components.
Is the delay changeble so i can set it to something shorter? Also I have not gotten there yet, but i am planning to have some lighting control rule within CQC with CQC telling ELK which lights to turn on/off. Would this still be subject to the same delays?
SETTING LEVEL TO 0
- The ELK lighting rules allow me to turn the light on to xx% value, which for ALC the dimmer create a fairly smooth transition doing so.
- When transition speed is slower/nices when using 'Set to 100%' then 'Turn On'
- Using "Turn Off' is not smooth at all and the problem is that the screens do not allow 'Set to 0%', the lowest value is 1%. This means there no way to turns the lights of smoothly unless i used double the rules space to first set it to 1% and then issue the turn off command. While this could work it's obviously not the most sensible way.
- The interesting thing is that when controller the lights using CQC with CQC giving the commands to ELK to turn the ALC lights on/off the CQC system allow me to 'set to 0'.
It is possible to change something to allow the rules to control the lights by 'Set to 0%' rather then 'turn off'? This would be great. Since It's already possible when CQC issues the command to ELK it seems strange that the ELK cannot do it by itself.
My overall plan is to have basic lighting control rules within the ELK which are all prefixed with a condition checking if CQC is online. If CQC is online then it would control all the lighting by issuing commands to the ELK and none of the ELK lighting rules woudl execute. If CQC is offline then the ELK lighting rules would be functional. I plan to have ELK check if CQC is online by having CQC flip an output every 60 seconds and then have ELK reset a counter everytime this happens. If the counter reaches 0 that means CQC didn't flip the ouput and it's offline.