This is all very confusing. You quoted a thread where someone asked me about a v1.5 KPL, and I answered.
From what I have read I think I2 just means extended messaging enabled and is probably only important to developers. The Remotelinc and Keypadlinc 1.5 are I2 but nothing else is yet as far as I can tell. Unless you are the guy behind the curtain wrestling with programming peeks and pokes it should not matter to you.
From what I have read I think I2 just means extended messaging enabled and is probably only important to developers. The Remotelinc and Keypadlinc 1.5 are I2 but nothing else is yet as far as I can tell. Unless you are the guy behind the curtain wrestling with programming peeks and pokes it should not matter to you.
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh thank you....
A very straight answer.
Much appreciated.
From what I have read I think I2 just means extended messaging enabled and is probably only important to developers. The Remotelinc and Keypadlinc 1.5 are I2 but nothing else is yet as far as I can tell. Unless you are the guy behind the curtain wrestling with programming peeks and pokes it should not matter to you.
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh thank you....
A very straight answer.
Much appreciated.
For me Insteon2 = UPB...![]()
Digger, please provide multiple links or clarify your comments. All I could find is one post on one forum where one person asked about it. I couldn't find anybody say they were testing Insteon 2.What are you talking about? Its being discussed on other forums and I dont see anything negative about it.
<snip>
Go to UDI Forum and you will see a few people discusing it and one person saying he will test it in a few weeks (meaning beta?)
Digger, please provide multiple links or clarify your comments. All I could find is one post on one forum where one person asked about it. I couldn't find anybody say they were testing Insteon 2.What are you talking about? Its being discussed on other forums and I dont see anything negative about it.
<snip>
Go to UDI Forum and you will see a few people discusing it and one person saying he will test it in a few weeks (meaning beta?)
I would still appreciate it if you could justify your actions and provide links to what you claimed.Digger, please provide multiple links or clarify your comments. All I could find is one post on one forum where one person asked about it. I couldn't find anybody say they were testing Insteon 2.What are you talking about? Its being discussed on other forums and I dont see anything negative about it.
<snip>
Go to UDI Forum and you will see a few people discusing it and one person saying he will test it in a few weeks (meaning beta?)
Actuallu Mike just clarified its out already in the REmote and the new firmware for the keypad. So no worries. Unfortunately it apparently did not add any features like the person asked. Oh well.
I would still appreciate it if you could justify your actions and provide links to what you claimed.Digger, please provide multiple links or clarify your comments. All I could find is one post on one forum where one person asked about it. I couldn't find anybody say they were testing Insteon 2.What are you talking about? Its being discussed on other forums and I dont see anything negative about it.
<snip>
Go to UDI Forum and you will see a few people discusing it and one person saying he will test it in a few weeks (meaning beta?)
Actuallu Mike just clarified its out already in the REmote and the new firmware for the keypad. So no worries. Unfortunately it apparently did not add any features like the person asked. Oh well.
I would still appreciate it if you could justify your actions and provide links to what you claimed.Digger, please provide multiple links or clarify your comments. All I could find is one post on one forum where one person asked about it. I couldn't find anybody say they were testing Insteon 2.What are you talking about? Its being discussed on other forums and I dont see anything negative about it.
<snip>
Go to UDI Forum and you will see a few people discusing it and one person saying he will test it in a few weeks (meaning beta?)
Actuallu Mike just clarified its out already in the REmote and the new firmware for the keypad. So no worries. Unfortunately it apparently did not add any features like the person asked. Oh well.
I asked if anyone knew what the new features were about mentioned (asked about) in the other forum as I was very curious. It turned out to be no new features from what Mike said. Unless someone else has more information then..... well.... oh well maybe next time.
If you want to know who is testing it I guess Mike B will when he tests the V1.5 firmware and anyone else since apparently I2 is in that device and the remotelinc. I think Mike B. said he was busy for a few weeks and may not have even been aware of the I2 in it.
I would still appreciate it if you could justify your actions and provide links to what you claimed.Digger, please provide multiple links or clarify your comments. All I could find is one post on one forum where one person asked about it. I couldn't find anybody say they were testing Insteon 2.What are you talking about? Its being discussed on other forums and I dont see anything negative about it.
<snip>
Go to UDI Forum and you will see a few people discusing it and one person saying he will test it in a few weeks (meaning beta?)
Actuallu Mike just clarified its out already in the REmote and the new firmware for the keypad. So no worries. Unfortunately it apparently did not add any features like the person asked. Oh well.
I asked if anyone knew what the new features were about mentioned (asked about) in the other forum as I was very curious. It turned out to be no new features from what Mike said. Unless someone else has more information then..... well.... oh well maybe next time.
If you want to know who is testing it I guess Mike B will when he tests the V1.5 firmware and anyone else since apparently I2 is in that device and the remotelinc. I think Mike B. said he was busy for a few weeks and may not have even been aware of the I2 in it.
I am not trying to beat a dead horse, Digger, but I think we are all tired of you playing loose with the facts and not answering direct questions. You said "Its being discussed on other forums" and have refused to provide a single link, much less the multiple links that a plural forums demands. You said "one person saying he will test it in a few weeks" and you have refused to provide a link to back that quote up. In my opinion, you are either being too casual in your inflammatory posts or are deliberately twisting things to incite a riot. Then you wonder why people take exception to your posts.
I have no idea what changed in KPL 1.5 that somebody is calling it "Insteon 2". The Remotelincs have been shipping for a while, are supported by various softwares and I never heard anybody call them "Insteon 2". If the new KPL 1.5 firmware is going to require software updates to support them, then SH needs to make that very clear to the customers. I didn't see anything on http://www.smarthome.com/2486d.html that gave any hint that software updates are now needed, but then it doesn't look like they have posted updated new user manuals either, even though 1.5 is shipping. If "Insteon 2" exists, somebody should be able to properly document what changed. If "Insteon 2" is just a slang name, then it needs to be indicated as such.
In discussions I have with SH staffers long ago indicated that the then current products WERE considered V2 and the old X10 only stuff was V1, which is looking at it strictly from a *Linc perspective, not an Insteon only perspective. Any possible/future products of the next generation would likely be called V3. Now take that in the same vein as the Elk M2 in that this is purely speculation about future projects and dreaming, neither Elk nor SH has confirmed anything. In both cases, it is pretty safe to assume a great deal of compatibility will exist. All good companies always have to at least be thinking about "the next generation", but that information is usually kept as a closely guarded secret & for good reason. I bet Chevy already has some ideas about the 2012 Corvette.
"Someone told me" is hearsay. I asked for the link to read it in full context. In fact, I asked (nicely) multiple times (since post #6) and you still haven't given a single link.Someone told me that the remotelinc and the keypadlinc V1.5 has I2. Maybe they are mistaken but you can see the post for yourself. I copied the post from UDI over here yet you keep asking for it. Its here. WHat more do you want. Frank asked what new features are in I2 and I basically asked the same question here. Someone here knew the answer (so was it so wrong to ask here). So whats the problem?
I usually fail to see the point of releasing something with a name if it doesn't affect users. So, if "Insteon 2" exists, then I assume it will have some impact on users. That impact may be as (apparently) minor as they need to get new software or re-read the instruction manual if they want to use the new features. But I doubt the software developers call that "minor". And I doubt many users will note a new feature buried in the document if you don't call it out to them.Is it that big of a deal that they came out with a new version if it is true that it does not affect users? We didnt know that before this thread and now we do. Great we learned something today and there is nothing wrong with what SH did (except maybe they forgot to tell people).
"Someone told me" is hearsay. I asked for the link to read it in full context. In fact, I asked (nicely) multiple times (since post #6) and you still haven't given a single link.Someone told me that the remotelinc and the keypadlinc V1.5 has I2. Maybe they are mistaken but you can see the post for yourself. I copied the post from UDI over here yet you keep asking for it. Its here. WHat more do you want. Frank asked what new features are in I2 and I basically asked the same question here. Someone here knew the answer (so was it so wrong to ask here). So whats the problem?
"Maybe they are mistaken but you can see the post for yourself." I cannot see the post as the forum you alluded too doesn't have a search engine if you aren't a member. Please provide the requested links.
"So whats the problem?" You still haven't provided any response to my questions about a second forum or to who is testing "Insteon 2".
Basically, you started a thread asking a lot of leading, speculative questions, implied things and have refused to provide any evidence to back up any of your comments!
I usually fail to see the point of releasing something with a name if it doesn't affect users. So, if "Insteon 2" exists, then I assume it will have some impact on users. That impact may be as (apparently) minor as they need to get new software or re-read the instruction manual if they want to use the new features. But I doubt the software developers call that "minor". And I doubt many users will note a new feature buried in the document if you don't call it out to them.Is it that big of a deal that they came out with a new version if it is true that it does not affect users? We didnt know that before this thread and now we do. Great we learned something today and there is nothing wrong with what SH did (except maybe they forgot to tell people).