Desert_AIP
Senior Member
Check your settings for when DST triggers.
I think everyone here is a beta tester for Leviton. Of course we don't get paid and in fact have to purchase their equipment in order to test it.StarTrekDoors said:So I have a question; how many on this forum are beta testers for Leviton and what other features did you ask for in the Notifier Board that don't exist today? :horse:
The first time I went into PC Access, Daylight Savings Time Active Now was UNCHECKED but the time on all my consoles was an hour ahead. So, I checked this option, saved the file and downloaded everything to the controller. This immediately resolved my time problem. I again just went into PC Access to check the status of Daylight Savings Time Active Now and it was UNCHECKED. But anyway, the console time is no longer a issue.Desert_AIP said:The dates of the DST transitions should be settings in PC Access
We should be OFF DST now, back to standard time.
Daylight Savings Time Active Now should be UNCHECKED
JonW said:[SIZE=14.3999996185303px]StarTrekDoors - I've dealt with several embedded systems and can say with fair certainty that the lack of including onboard features in the OPII for the NTP and SSL e-mail capability comes down to processor and memory limitations of the current platform. Additionally, I'd bet the design choice of using a serial port for communications to the OPII is two-fold: (1) no IP config needed on the notifier board as the OPII will always find it on the designated serial port and (2) the OPII is limited in the number of concurrent IP connections it can support and the notifier board would have to take one of these precious connections.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=14.3999996185303px]Leviton did not have any of their own controllers in the alarm/automation segment, so I just can't see them letting the Omnipro line die. The [/SIZE]acquisition[SIZE=14.3999996185303px] was just too big to go that route. I would also guess that there is an OP3 in development that would bring all the new features that people want (the OPII platform just can't support it).[/SIZE]
?Frederick C. Wilt said:Anybody know why the board needed to have its own network connection?