kwilcox
Active Member
My UPB switches respond about twice as fast as my X10 switches. This is very noticable in my motion sensor controlled lights. UPB, like X10, is succeptable to collisions when multiple commands are placed on the powerline simultaneously. However, the protocol contains built in re-transmission capabilities to minimize this. Plus, unlike X10, there is a short "ack" packet built into the UPB protocol that provides necessary feedback that a command has been carried out.
There is no relationship to the size of the UPB installation and the speed of any given UPB command btw. A 200 switch application will operate at the same speed as a 5 switch application. The only thing that could affect transmissions would be large numbers of devices simultaneously placing information on the powerline. In UPB's cased that could only be if large numbers of switches were pressed simultaneously, an unlikely scenario for sure. There is no need with a UPB installation to periodically issue all device status requests as many do with their X10 installations since the automatic ACK built into the protocol insures that the controller is in sync with the actual state of the UPB devices its commands. I've noticed, btw, that issuing a status request to a UPB device returns a result almost 3 times faster then issuing one with an X10 device.
Remember too, that the UPB link paradigm insures that large numbers of devices can be controlled very quickly. This is very much unlike the X10 group command where all devices in the group must be enumerated in the command itself. UPB simply sends the link ID and all devices in the link respond with their own stored responses.
Bottom line IMO is that greatly increased transmission speed coupled with the fact that the protocol itself is optimized for the characteristics of powerline transmission results in a highly reliable, fast HA system. This must be the reason why professional installers are doing very large UPB installations. I myself am excited to begin offering UPB installations. We're printing up the marketing materials now and I should begin installing UPB sometime in Q3. This based on my own testing. The difference between UPB and X10 is night and day.
There is no relationship to the size of the UPB installation and the speed of any given UPB command btw. A 200 switch application will operate at the same speed as a 5 switch application. The only thing that could affect transmissions would be large numbers of devices simultaneously placing information on the powerline. In UPB's cased that could only be if large numbers of switches were pressed simultaneously, an unlikely scenario for sure. There is no need with a UPB installation to periodically issue all device status requests as many do with their X10 installations since the automatic ACK built into the protocol insures that the controller is in sync with the actual state of the UPB devices its commands. I've noticed, btw, that issuing a status request to a UPB device returns a result almost 3 times faster then issuing one with an X10 device.
Remember too, that the UPB link paradigm insures that large numbers of devices can be controlled very quickly. This is very much unlike the X10 group command where all devices in the group must be enumerated in the command itself. UPB simply sends the link ID and all devices in the link respond with their own stored responses.
Bottom line IMO is that greatly increased transmission speed coupled with the fact that the protocol itself is optimized for the characteristics of powerline transmission results in a highly reliable, fast HA system. This must be the reason why professional installers are doing very large UPB installations. I myself am excited to begin offering UPB installations. We're printing up the marketing materials now and I should begin installing UPB sometime in Q3. This based on my own testing. The difference between UPB and X10 is night and day.