tmbrown97
Senior Member
Without getting into the rest of the thread - the 3560 is a wire speed switch with plenty of capacity; so if it's carved up into a couple of VLANS and they're maxing out their ports, they really won't affect the next VLAN over; then again, even without VLAN's, if a couple of ports are running at max speed, it won't affect the next port over any. By separating VLANs you avoid the broadcast messages and other junk traffic - that's the main advantage. Honestly, it's probably unnecessary for residential but it certainly won't hurt and it can be nice and clean - although Cisco CLI/IOS isn't for the faint of heart. If you work in the business you love it - but if you don't it's your worst nightmare (and definitely weeds out those who know what they're doing from those who don't!).wkearney99 said:A VLAN isn't going to lessen the impact on the switch. And a switch would already be isolating packet traffic. So using a VLAN doesn't really buy you anything as far as traffic impact. What would impact it would be segregating the traffic on a separate switch. Then you're only dealing with traffic that actually needs to get in/out of the camera setup (a client viewing them, etc). But then I'm not familiar with the 3560. A VLAN certainly can't 'hurt', other than the configuration complexity, but I wouldn't assume just how much it would actually help.