Use of non-Z-wave remote switches in 3-way applications

[DeltaNu1142]

I'm installing Vizia RF/legacy Monster switches (not the RF+ or most recent versions) throughout my home, and I was thinking about using non-RF/non-Z-wave remote switches in my three-way circuits. Aside from not repeating Z-wave commands as part of the network, are there any other limitations I should consider? How is local control affected (in dimmer circuits, mostly)? Has anyone done this?

 

[ChrisWalker]

I'm installing Vizia RF/legacy Monster switches (not the RF+ or most recent versions) throughout my home, and I was thinking about using non-RF/non-Z-wave remote switches in my three-way circuits. Aside from not repeating Z-wave commands as part of the network, are there any other limitations I should consider? How is local control affected (in dimmer circuits, mostly)? Has anyone done this?

For new construction, and for retrofits where you have the appropriate wiring for non-RF remote switches
I would use the Vizia (non-RF) remote switches (paired with the Vizia RF master switches).

RF virtual switches are pretty awesome but wired almost always wins over wireless for reliability. Plus the non-RF remote switches are usually less expensive. I've set up homes both ways.

For retrofits which lack the necessary wiring for non-RF remote switches
The virtual switches (RF) are a great option for these types of installs.

Caveat regarding mesh/repeater networks
With technologies like Z-Wave, messages between devices are often bounced through repeaters. If your RF devices are spread apart more than 30-40 feet indoors, you may want some extra RF devices (repeaters) to enhance reliability. This usually isn't an issue, but if it is then RF virtual switches may be preferred.

 

[DeltaNu1142]

I don't have the challenges of having my devices really far apart. I ordered three non-RF remote dimming switches today for $6 each (before shipping):

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000ZKM7Q0