Microsoft was founded on stolen ideas and technology after it was stolen from Xerox by Apple.
A fascinating story here, though it's not clear what was "stolen." Xerox had a stellar research center at Palo Alto (PARC) and invented a good deal of the technology we rely upon every day, including (basically) the "windows" paradigm and the LAN. Xerox consistenly failed to recognize their own R&D achievements and utterly failed to commercialize them. The only business model they really knew was the "click-count" of their copier business.
Steve Jobs was (and remains) a self-absorbed juvenile who recognized the power of the windows paradigm but, in his petulance and arrogance, permitted only closed systems.
I am no supporter of Microsoft, but Bill Gates at least had far better business sense than both Jobs or Xerox.
I don´t have a problem with people making money, as long as they deserve that money.
You must know that the "deserve" idea is dangerous. It is precisely what Dave_X10 was getting at with his reference to Marx. Who exactly has the privilege to determine what is "deserving?" And what exactly are the criteria?
Does the multi-millionaire basketball player or Rugby player "deserve" their wealth? What did they do, exactly, to make the world a better place?
And you must know that neither Xerox nor Apple "deserve" the rights to Windows -- after all, by their business ignorance they denied the world a powerful technology. And Microsoft, on the other hand, does deserve it, for exactly the opposite reason.
B)