This reply is in response to DavidL's question in the
CQC Pricing Thread where I stated that I feel MainLobby3 is still in beta.
His response was:
BSR, It would be good (and appreciated) if you provided a bit of detail on that statement.
I am aware that you upgraded the MLServer without reading the release notes that say you also have to upgrade the client due to a new feature that was added (post launch) that required both sides to be updated. I do realize that this was a PITA for you. As an update, you are not the only one that didn't read the release notes. So, we will be adding a notice in the installer for that version that the client has to also be updated, when that is required to be a little more obvious.
David;
Wow, if one were to actually try to explain why I think ML3 is still in beta after a reply like that it's like trying to answer someone that asks "Why is that blue sky blue?".
Beta (at least in BSR's definition) is when you first put out code/product that you and a select few others have been testing (in an alpha stage) in the hopes of getting to a production release once the "bugs" have been worked out by a larger test group. This usually requires many versions released once this alpha version gets to this test group.
Look at how many versions of ML3 and server have been put out! How can you possibly say this software is ready for release? The "bugs" have not been worked out!
Yes, I was caught in the middle of this when I complained of updating my MLServer software only to find my ML client broke. Your response was to say the software is "evolving" and really offered very little support on my comments other than to say "sorry your having problems with it".
Now you say others are having the same problems I experienced.
I reverted back to my old (stable) version and will not upgrade, even though I paid for it, until I see the software is finished "evolving" (you say tomaaato, I say tomahto).
The reason; I don't feel like playing "beta boy" (wow our members should have a lot of fun with that expression). The
only reason I upgraded was because the software was released.
I tried MusicLobby when it was in "beta" and yes, had problems with that, but hey, I got everything coming to me because I knew it was "beta".
Will Cinemar get there and have a great product that is even better than the older version?
Of course they will. So will HomeSeer, eventually...
I also don't care much for the new license scheme, which I also consider still in beta. When your software license "disappears" and you have to reregister, I consider that a problem that should have been worked out in, you guessed it, "beta" mode.
I really like Mario and hope he is taking the correct path here. He has been instrumental with Cinemar's HA take on its line, and I have full confidence in him and his company to eventually produce an excellent "released" product.
So call it what you want, I'm waiting in the wings and in the mean time, placed my MainLobby3 license on the shelf right next to my HomeSeer2 license, waiting for the right time! :blink:
Hope this response is "appreciated"!
Regards,
BSR