FYI, I used
THESE Concord AGM batteries in solar applications in a previous job and would run them down way past 50% in the winter (did not have enough solar charge on a few stations) and they would always charge back up. I was routinely impressed each year with them.
And AGM's require no maintenance beyond periodic inspection of terminals and don't emit appreciable hydrogen.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
it is axiomatic that a system that adds more functionality may add complexity.
As best I understand it, a grid-tie system with no battery back-up adds no functionality to home automation.
It may, of course, depending on rate-payer and tax-payer subsidies, make financial sense, and may have an 'environmental' payback beyond the educational value and startup aspects.
But the only apparent (to me)
consequence to home automation of a domestic grid-tie system is negative, namely possible decreased AC quality wrt noise. Note this is entirely different than asserting that a grid-tie is not useful for other compelling reasons (and I don't).
Systems that add backup or other functionality ( battery-backed inverter, generator, UPS's, wind, etc) will add complexity. But may they be very much worth the extra complexity because they also add function and usefulness.
The argument that this added complexity is not warranted in any case is silly in my opinion in part because it only reflects circumstances and preferences of some folks at one point in time.
The circumstances are in turn governed by geography (eg: solar insolation) , condition of public infrastructure (eg: frequency and severity of power outages), use of power (consequence to user of a power outage), energy costs, and tax and other incentives.
So location ( location, location) dictates.
And the constellation of power quality issues caused by these additional power sources share some aspects of the AC power quality issues associated with grid-tie systems.
Which is why IMO, continued discussion is at least kinda pertinent to this thread.
HTH ... Marc