@ work:
2011 NEC 300.9 and 334.12(B)(4) are your references....followed by 340.10 uf cable uses permitted (4) installed as non.metaiic sheathed cable. In your locale ave the inspector read 358.22 (2005) and then tell him to read article 334 to see if he can find where it is prohibited. Even in the earlier code cycles it was not forbidden.
That said Romex is not allowed in wet locations (conduit) however UF would be...the difference being the THHN vs. THWN conductors within the jackets (though this is assumption, as they are unmarked). You are not, however, allowed to remove the jacket and run the individual conductors within a conduit (individual conductors not marked).
In the case of Romex in conduits within a dry space, once you do the calcs and figure the fill, size the conduit for no more than a 55% fill,then the derating, it's legal, no distance restrictions.
Also, NM would technically be legal in conduit in a dry location, but generally it's going to be preferred to pull individual conductors for ease (or transition between NM and conduit conductors at a JB).
It's a huge grey area and subject to interpretation in both directions....and can be argued to no end, however if it was "illegal" they would not make the NM to EMT connectors.
2011 NEC 300.9 and 334.12(B)(4) are your references....followed by 340.10 uf cable uses permitted (4) installed as non.metaiic sheathed cable. In your locale ave the inspector read 358.22 (2005) and then tell him to read article 334 to see if he can find where it is prohibited. Even in the earlier code cycles it was not forbidden.
That said Romex is not allowed in wet locations (conduit) however UF would be...the difference being the THHN vs. THWN conductors within the jackets (though this is assumption, as they are unmarked). You are not, however, allowed to remove the jacket and run the individual conductors within a conduit (individual conductors not marked).
In the case of Romex in conduits within a dry space, once you do the calcs and figure the fill, size the conduit for no more than a 55% fill,then the derating, it's legal, no distance restrictions.
Also, NM would technically be legal in conduit in a dry location, but generally it's going to be preferred to pull individual conductors for ease (or transition between NM and conduit conductors at a JB).
It's a huge grey area and subject to interpretation in both directions....and can be argued to no end, however if it was "illegal" they would not make the NM to EMT connectors.