drozwood90
Senior Member
My only suggestion...multi-core.
If you want to do anything more then 1 thing at a time (maybe 2 IF the second is NOT tied to a processor's free time), you'll need multiple cores.
I went cheaper way back when the new dual core chips were coming out, and my Celeron (single core 2.12GHZ) is holing it's own. BUT, the system is doing what it was designed for. Serving files and running Homeseer. That's it. Can't really get it to do anything else. So, I've pieced together a second system. I'll control that through HS so it's only running when I want it to run. It was cheaper to do that, then to invest in a new system...although Telefragger seems to have outdone himself in this thread over on the HS forum:
http://forums.homeseer.com/showthread.php?t=138567
Post 14 specifically.
So, that's why I setup my system. Just need to set XP or Win2k (I'm not sure which one I've got left laying around) to hibernate, instead of shutdown, so I can get it to boot back up as quickly as possible.
--Dan
If you want to do anything more then 1 thing at a time (maybe 2 IF the second is NOT tied to a processor's free time), you'll need multiple cores.
I went cheaper way back when the new dual core chips were coming out, and my Celeron (single core 2.12GHZ) is holing it's own. BUT, the system is doing what it was designed for. Serving files and running Homeseer. That's it. Can't really get it to do anything else. So, I've pieced together a second system. I'll control that through HS so it's only running when I want it to run. It was cheaper to do that, then to invest in a new system...although Telefragger seems to have outdone himself in this thread over on the HS forum:
http://forums.homeseer.com/showthread.php?t=138567
Post 14 specifically.
So, that's why I setup my system. Just need to set XP or Win2k (I'm not sure which one I've got left laying around) to hibernate, instead of shutdown, so I can get it to boot back up as quickly as possible.
--Dan