I'm sure you've figured out by now that there is no "best" choice out there. Everything depends on your individual preferences, tolerances and needs.
I, for one, am reasonably happy with Insteon (I use mostly Icons). There is a laundry list of things that I wish were different, but there are so many positives that overcome the limitations.
Pros
-----
- Even at $25 (I bought most of mine at $20), the Icons are tough to compete with on price vs performance. I currently have 25 Icons, 2 Switchlinc V2s, and 2 Keypadlincs installed. I will soon be adding another 15 Icons.
- My wife and I love the simplicity of the Icon's single LED. I plan of swapping out the V2 faceplates with Icons to keep the look consistent. We really don't care for the dimmer LED bars on switches. I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
- The Keypadlincs are nice looking, especially with custom buttons.
- The physical size of the switches made installation alot easier than my old X10 switches. I have some triple gang boxes that were still a real pain to fit the Icons in; anything bigger would have really sucked.
- Having X10 support allows for migration from an X10 based system to Insteon, though HA Software like Homeseer makes this not as big a deal (assuming you want a PC running all the time). I currently use X10 Hawkeye motion detectors to control loads without the need to HA software.
- I do use Homeseer, but want as much of the system as possible to work when Homeseer is down. Much of the switch links can be stored on the switchand the motion detectors can directly control the lights. I'm not sure of how much functionality is stored on the switch for UPB and Zwave.
- Local load changes are reported to the PLC. I believe there are some Zwave devices that don't support this (thus requiring polling).
- Virtually instant reaction to switch presses, whether it is the load's switch or a slave switch. Way better than X10. I always hated X10 for the half second delay added by slave switches. I've read that UPB is fairly sluggish in this respect; don't know about Zwave.
- Reliable messaging. When I press a button, I feel 99% confident that the correct action will take place. This is more than good enough for me; I was ok with the 95% that I had with X10. My understanding is that UPB and Zwave are even more reliable than Insteon in this respect.
Cons
------
- There are definitely QC issues: the LED brightness can vary from switch to switch, the paddles are flaky on a couple of sitches, and I've had 1 or 2 outright failures of installed switches.
- Software support at this point is not good. Homeseer cannot create switch links. Powerhome can manage the links, but is not user friendly. I haven't tested the Smarthome software package.
- Lots of holes in the product line at this point: no RF remote, no motion detector, etc. Since I use Homeseer, I have been able to work around this by keeping some X10 product in place.
If I were forced to choose again now, I'd still pick Insteon Icon on price, looks, and functionality. They are an amazing deal. After factoring in the PLC and Signallinc costs, I think I've come out way lower than Zwave or UPB, without having to make large sacrifices in functionality. The other options would probably have run 2-3 times more a simlar solution. Even after the headaches/cost of replacing problematic devices, I still think I came out ahead.
If I had more high-wattage loads (which would prohibit the use of Icons), the value/cost goes way down to far. I would likely NOT choose Insteon.
However, and this is where personal tolerances come into play, I could not spend an $50+ per switch for a large number of switches, no matter how good/reliable it was. I would either go scale back and automate only key locations, or go back to cheap X10 switches (which were "pretty good"), or do without automated lights. But again, that is my personal opinion. Some people are more than happy to pay $100 per switch for Lutron (which I'm sure are awesome); I just don't happen to be one of them...
Chris
I, for one, am reasonably happy with Insteon (I use mostly Icons). There is a laundry list of things that I wish were different, but there are so many positives that overcome the limitations.
Pros
-----
- Even at $25 (I bought most of mine at $20), the Icons are tough to compete with on price vs performance. I currently have 25 Icons, 2 Switchlinc V2s, and 2 Keypadlincs installed. I will soon be adding another 15 Icons.
- My wife and I love the simplicity of the Icon's single LED. I plan of swapping out the V2 faceplates with Icons to keep the look consistent. We really don't care for the dimmer LED bars on switches. I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
- The Keypadlincs are nice looking, especially with custom buttons.
- The physical size of the switches made installation alot easier than my old X10 switches. I have some triple gang boxes that were still a real pain to fit the Icons in; anything bigger would have really sucked.
- Having X10 support allows for migration from an X10 based system to Insteon, though HA Software like Homeseer makes this not as big a deal (assuming you want a PC running all the time). I currently use X10 Hawkeye motion detectors to control loads without the need to HA software.
- I do use Homeseer, but want as much of the system as possible to work when Homeseer is down. Much of the switch links can be stored on the switchand the motion detectors can directly control the lights. I'm not sure of how much functionality is stored on the switch for UPB and Zwave.
- Local load changes are reported to the PLC. I believe there are some Zwave devices that don't support this (thus requiring polling).
- Virtually instant reaction to switch presses, whether it is the load's switch or a slave switch. Way better than X10. I always hated X10 for the half second delay added by slave switches. I've read that UPB is fairly sluggish in this respect; don't know about Zwave.
- Reliable messaging. When I press a button, I feel 99% confident that the correct action will take place. This is more than good enough for me; I was ok with the 95% that I had with X10. My understanding is that UPB and Zwave are even more reliable than Insteon in this respect.
Cons
------
- There are definitely QC issues: the LED brightness can vary from switch to switch, the paddles are flaky on a couple of sitches, and I've had 1 or 2 outright failures of installed switches.
- Software support at this point is not good. Homeseer cannot create switch links. Powerhome can manage the links, but is not user friendly. I haven't tested the Smarthome software package.
- Lots of holes in the product line at this point: no RF remote, no motion detector, etc. Since I use Homeseer, I have been able to work around this by keeping some X10 product in place.
If I were forced to choose again now, I'd still pick Insteon Icon on price, looks, and functionality. They are an amazing deal. After factoring in the PLC and Signallinc costs, I think I've come out way lower than Zwave or UPB, without having to make large sacrifices in functionality. The other options would probably have run 2-3 times more a simlar solution. Even after the headaches/cost of replacing problematic devices, I still think I came out ahead.
If I had more high-wattage loads (which would prohibit the use of Icons), the value/cost goes way down to far. I would likely NOT choose Insteon.
However, and this is where personal tolerances come into play, I could not spend an $50+ per switch for a large number of switches, no matter how good/reliable it was. I would either go scale back and automate only key locations, or go back to cheap X10 switches (which were "pretty good"), or do without automated lights. But again, that is my personal opinion. Some people are more than happy to pay $100 per switch for Lutron (which I'm sure are awesome); I just don't happen to be one of them...
Chris