pete_c
Guru
Here relating to WAF; it is more of an acceptance of what is and related to what I have learned while working being able to implement said on the home network. Today that is more needed than ever before.
She has an IPhone (sisters do too) and it is primary used to gossip on social sites. It is easy for her to use. That said she still keeps it off most of the time and turns it on to use it or gossip.
Wife has heard text to speech here since the 1990's and I did have it in the home in the 1980's. That said she didn't understand it until she heard about it on a women's talk show and explained in an easy to understand language which was something I couldn't really do.
She knows how to use the Internet and that is all that matters for her. She really has never had any interest in remote controlling the home via cellular or a smart phone or accessing her home files or anything at home today.
My interests for VPN to home is related to just a secure connection without having to open multiple ports on my firewall. I do like going to my alarm panel via VPN over keeping ports on the firewall open. I use it.
Relating to work I was able to remote control an automotive assembly line via a modem connection to a controlling PC in 1995. In the 2000's I was able to manage some 250 global routers and more switches via the comfort of my home office via a VPN connection. It was instant and much faster than having to drive to operations and fixing things there.
That said I also use the central monitoring service pings and that really also works fine for me. That is me.
Lately seeing a political brew ha ha about cyber security, hacking and the such. These folks are just politicians. They are not policemen, cyber security folks, et al. Really it is all about stupidity and ignorance of what has been around now for years. There is nothing new about it. There are just a lot of people that do not know anything about it so they are making up stuff to compensate for their stupidity cuz it works better for them.
She has an IPhone (sisters do too) and it is primary used to gossip on social sites. It is easy for her to use. That said she still keeps it off most of the time and turns it on to use it or gossip.
Wife has heard text to speech here since the 1990's and I did have it in the home in the 1980's. That said she didn't understand it until she heard about it on a women's talk show and explained in an easy to understand language which was something I couldn't really do.
She knows how to use the Internet and that is all that matters for her. She really has never had any interest in remote controlling the home via cellular or a smart phone or accessing her home files or anything at home today.
My interests for VPN to home is related to just a secure connection without having to open multiple ports on my firewall. I do like going to my alarm panel via VPN over keeping ports on the firewall open. I use it.
Relating to work I was able to remote control an automotive assembly line via a modem connection to a controlling PC in 1995. In the 2000's I was able to manage some 250 global routers and more switches via the comfort of my home office via a VPN connection. It was instant and much faster than having to drive to operations and fixing things there.
That said I also use the central monitoring service pings and that really also works fine for me. That is me.
Lately seeing a political brew ha ha about cyber security, hacking and the such. These folks are just politicians. They are not policemen, cyber security folks, et al. Really it is all about stupidity and ignorance of what has been around now for years. There is nothing new about it. There are just a lot of people that do not know anything about it so they are making up stuff to compensate for their stupidity cuz it works better for them.
